I was listening to John Piper articulating a biblical theology of singleness the other day. He was, in part, challenging his listeners to consider if they had bought into the world’s view of marriage and singleness. He asked if, like the world, we place more value on marriage and less value on singleness than we ought.
I wonder if this comes from idealising children. Do we think that cuteness and innocence are synonymous with goodness? Do we think that there is nothing so fundamentally good as raising little children? I’m not for a moment wanting to deny the worth of this or the beauty, charm and sincere kindness of children. But I do want to say that these things will pass. They will not always be children. Before all else, they are people.
Those of us who are single have not drawn the short straw. There is nothing second-rate about only ever befriending, caring for and guiding other adults (and ‘adopting’ a few of their kids along the way). They too are people – little people grown big. It’s an enormous privilege and joy and pain to have involvement and influence in any person’s life.
As Piper makes plain, God’s people are no longer mostly the children of Jewish parents, but can now include all men, women and children from all races and nations. Let’s rejoice in the people that have been given us to care for.
4 comments:
great corrective Fi, thanks. people. little people.
I wonder if we could say the same things about marriage without children?
Obviously, marriage is good, and children are good, but do we tend to think children are the purpose of marriage? And marriage without children (especially by choice) is therefore second-rate?
Can married people minister to little people who have grown big too?
Thanks Fiona (H). You said, "One of the reasons in Corinthians that singleness is good is that you are able to singlemindedly seek to please God rather than your family too. Might the same reasoning be applied to married-without-kids?"
My response would be that it *might*, but I don't think that in the Bible it *is*.
The advent of contraception might change things if children were seen as neutral or only a little bit of a blessing. But I still think having children is seen as *so good* and *fitting* that I reckon it's just part of what a righteous life should look like for a married person. Which of course only serves to highlight the usefulness of the undistracted, devoted single life.
fair 'nough
Post a Comment