Tim Chester came and spoke at college about The Crowded House, his church planting organisation. He was winsome and engaging and I loved most of what he had to say. But he pretty much said that it's impossible to have real community unless you are frequently meeting your brothers and sisters and sharing your everyday lives with each other. It is only within this intense expression of community that evangelism, discipleship, accountability and openness will properly occur, or perhaps even occur at all.
I like the motivation behind his model and I even like the model itself. But I'm not convinced that we all need to change our church structures. I feel like community is still valid even if it is less frequent/intense. I even think that there are peculiarly good things about doing it the traditional way. There's working within an imperfect structure and making it beautiful. And there's the joy of singing and talking with people you don't know so well, just because you are brothers and sisters in Christ.
I don't know if my reasons are clear. It was hard to pin them down. Please ask if they aren't - or argue with them if you disagree.
2 comments:
I went to a conference he took last Friday in Campbell Town.
I've been familiar with his stuff for a while now and from the very first have always liked what he had to say.
So I am going to disagree with you on this. I think we do need to change our structures. Working within an imperfect structure and making it beautiful just doesn't make any sense to me.
I'm fine with talking and singing with Christians I don't know well. That's why I go to largish conferences.
But week in, week out I want to spend more time with my Christian friends outside the Sunday meeting than inside it. That will take some work on my part. But it's a question of priorities. And I think the NT drives me to think that way too.
I'm with you on this, Fi.
Real life involves a mix of initimate and less-intimate. That's just life, I reckon.
Post a Comment