Thursday, April 16, 2009

Evangelical and Pentecostal Churches

People who attend evangelical and pentecostal churches don’t always have a lot to do with each other.[1] Sometimes it because there’s disagreement and animosity; sometimes there’s disagreement and love; and sometimes it’s got nothing to do with disagreement – the circles just don’t mix. This lack of contact can lead to generalisations and stereotypes, neither of which are helpful. So I’m going to outline what I see as the primary focuses of and driving forces behind each group. I have more experience with evangelicalism than pentecostalism, so please forgive me if I get it wrong.

I'll begin speaking broadly. It seems to me that evangelicals focus more on the past and on our undeserved salvation, and pentecostals focus more on the future and on our amazing blessings. This means that evangelicals talk more about sin and forgiveness, and pentecostals more about empowerment and purpose. The evangelicals come across as pessimists and the pentecostals as optimists! Interestingly - and disturbingly - neither group focuses very much on our heavenly future.

To get more specific, I think that evangelicals desire to:

  • Be good (righteous/godly/loving/servant-hearted).
    They believe they get there by depending on God for each new thing – by repenting, praying, learning from and being obedient to his Word.
  • Know God better (and better comprehend his love).
    They get there by meditating on his Word, praying and being obedient.
  • See lost people saved.
    They get there by depending on God, preaching, loving and serving.

And pentecostals desire to:

  • Be fruitful (living out their calling, purpose and potential/being loving/being servant-hearted).
    They get there by having sincere, confident faith that God has given them the power to do this.
  • Experience a closer personal relationship with God.
    They get there by worshiping and praying.
  • See lost people saved.
    They get there by depending on God, preaching, loving and serving.

This is not to say that either group rejects or fails to practice any of what I have written for the other one, just that it’s not their primary emphasis.

So, what do you think? Have I portrayed both groups accurately? What's missing?

[1] Here I am using 'evangelical' to mean churches that are not liberal, high or pentecostal (or Catholic or Orthodox).

Friday, April 10, 2009

An Analogy, Two Allegories and Another Analogy

Spiritual analogies make me nervous. This is because they are attempts to explain the infinite with finite human experience. Don Carson comments on the judge analogy often used to explain Christ’s atoning death:-

A prisoner comes before a judge and the judge finds the prisoner guilty and sentences him to a fine of $50, 000, or three years in prison, whatever it is, and then the judge steps back from the bar, takes off his robes, goes down and writes the check for $50, 000, or alternatively goes to jail instead of the person who ought to go to jail, and this indicates substitution . . . . I’ve used that illustration to get across the notion of how Christ comes along and substitutes himself in my place . . . But you know, there’s something wrong with that illustration – it gets across the notion of substitution but there’s something wrong with it. What’s wrong with it is this – in the Western world our judges are merely administrators of a big system – so that if you commit a crime, you’re not thought to be sinning against the judge – you’re sinning against the state, or you’re sinning against the law, or you’re sinning against the people, or you’re sinning against the government – but you’re not sinning against the judge . . . . Thus the judge is not coming along as the offended party in our systems. He has always got to be the non-offended party and merely the person who is administering the bigger system . . . So in our system, in other words, if the mugger came along and mugged somebody else, then the judge pronounces sentence and then goes back down from the bench and takes the penalty himself, we would view that as profoundly unjust . . . . But with God, God is always the most offended party . . . . But that doesn’t mean he’s unjust! He’s always perfectly just – that’s his character. But he’s always the most offended party. Always. Always.[i]

A couple of Christian allegories on YouTube at the moment I find a little troubling.
One has a girl ostensibly a Christian who is seduced by the devil and the world, but who eventually seeks Christ and is saved by him. My problem with it is that all the time she is caught up in other things, Jesus is stage right, anxiously and ineffectually pacing around. This is not the Jesus I read of in the Bible who, in judgment, gives people over to their sin (Romans 1:18-25) and who in his perfect timing unhesitatingly redeems them (Ephesians 1:11).*

Another allegory bothers me for similar reasons. In this a father has to make a split-second decision whether to save his beloved son, or, by killing his son, save a trainload of people. It bothers me for three reasons. Firstly, we learn from the Bible that humanity is not merely a group of people distant from God. Rather, he have done him wrong and are in fact his enemies (Colossians 1:21; Ephesians 2:1-3; Romans 5:7-10). Secondly, Jesus went willingly to his death (Matthew 26:28-29; John 18:11; Mark 10:45). And finally, as in the previous example, God appears to be caught out, here being forced to make a quick, panicky decision. This is not the God who from all eternity purposed to send his Son to his death to save mankind (Acts 2:22-23; Ephesians 1:4-6; Galatians 4:4-5; John 3:16-17 etc). And yet, in their very great defence, I must recognise that Jesus himself used analogy and allegory, and trust that audiences will not take every particular seriously.

There is another analogy that bothers me more. It’s used by Timothy Keller in his wonderful apologetic book,
The Reason for God, to explain the need for the cross. In it, he makes divine forgiveness comparable to human forgiveness. He observes that as humans we find forgiveness very difficult. He states that it is in the painful work of forgiveness that we “bear the cost” or “absorb the debt” of our enemy’s sin in their place.[ii] So too with Jesus, he says. I think this analogy is unhelpful and dangerous. It reduces the exercise of God’s justice to a psychological process. This is not how the Bible speaks of God’s justice. It speaks of a just punishment being meted out on Jesus in our place (Isaiah 53:5-12; Romans 3:25-26). The punishment was not somehow bound up in the forgiveness. The punishment was first carried out to perfect completion – so that anyone who relies on Jesus might then be forgiven (Hebrews 9:14, 26; 10:10; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 10:43). Any other conception renders God a little less just, and so a little less perfect, and so it all falls down.

[i] D.A. Carson speaking at ‘A Day With Dr Don’, session 1, http://theresurgence.com/a-day-with-dr-don-session-1-video accessed 11/4/09

[ii] T. Keller, The Reason for God (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2008) 192.

*On reflection though, our God is a personal God who is far from unfeeling. Perhaps this allegory is in fact a good representation of part of his character . . .

"When Israel was a child, I loved him,
and out of Egypt I called my son.

But the more I called Israel,
the further they went from me.
They sacrificed to the Baals
and they burned incense to images.

It was I who taught Ephraim to walk,
taking them by the arms;
but they did not realize
it was I who healed them.

I led them with cords of human kindness,
with ties of love;
I lifted the yoke from their neck
and bent down to feed them.

"Will they not return to Egypt
and will not Assyria rule over them
because they refuse to repent?

Swords will flash in their cities,
will destroy the bars of their gates
and put an end to their plans.

My people are determined to turn from me.
Even if they call to the Most High,
he will by no means exalt them.

"How can I give you up, Ephraim?
How can I hand you over, Israel?
How can I treat you like Admah?
How can I make you like Zeboiim?
My heart is changed within me;
all my compassion is aroused.

I will not carry out my fierce anger,
nor will I turn and devastate Ephraim.
For I am God, and not man—
the Holy One among you.
I will not come in wrath.

They will follow the LORD;
he will roar like a lion.
When he roars,
his children will come trembling from the west.

They will come trembling
like birds from Egypt,
like doves from Assyria.
I will settle them in their homes,"
declares the LORD.

Hosea 11:1-11

The Tough Road That Leads to Thankfulness and Joy

We come to Jesus messy people out of a messy world, knowing what people are like. How then can we ever understand our holy God? For me, I found it difficult to trust that God was working for my best. I knew this must be true yet I couldn’t understand it. So, I just pressed on living in obedience to my heavenly Father.

As the days have gone by, I’ve been through some hard stuff and I have learned His mettle. He is always there. He always sustains me. He is always sufficient for me. He is always refining me. He never denies me. It took a while, but I trust Him now.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Money and Stuff: Postscript

I have spoken previously about my struggles with money and about the things I was trying to learn (money isn't everything; be content with enough; be generous with your surplus; don't be greedy). Well I thought it was about time to report back. Praise God this is not a big problem for me anymore! He has taught me well and, no doubt, people have been praying for me (thank you).

The most helpful thing has been to remind myself to be content with enough. It's hard to argue against! I still have times when I desire gorgeous fashion or quality homewares, but I guess I can also see through that all now. I mean I know that having that stuff does not make you happy. If I have enough and I have eternal blessings, then I am in a better position than they. Not that I'm better than or superior to them - just that I am very fortunate. And it's not like you can't express yourself aesthetically or dress creatively when you don't have loads of money - you still can, just not as much, but that's okay 'cos aesthetic isn't everything either. I've even become pretty content with not being able to buy CDs - I mean music's not my passion in life anyway, and you know, I have quite a few CDs already, and there's always the radio. Keeping up with the latest music isn't my birthright. It's a Western privilege and it's okay that it's one I don't currently have access to.

As well as being content with what we presently have, I also said that we had no need to worry about the future because God has promised to give us enough. That has been my experience time and time again. In my case, he uses ordinary means - people's generosity, the government's stimulus package, things on sale.

And now it looks like he's given me a great job! For this year and last I've been trying off and on to find a better paying job, because I think I should support myself while I'm studying - just like everyone else does. No one's been very keen to employ someone in a (semi) professional position for only one day a week . . . until now! I think I might have found a wonderful job teaching English and writing to primary and high school students in a private tutoring company. The boss seems very kind and I like his philosophy and method. And it pays $30/hour instead of $18/hour at my (wonderful) kitchen job. I'll find out next week if he needs me, but it's looking good at the moment. I'm so enormously relieved and thankful.

Monday, March 23, 2009

In heaven I will ski

I can't imagine heaven. My small mind struggles to comprehend anything good that is not in this world, or anything better than this world. So here's my childlike conception of heaven - it will be something like this, but infinitely better.

In heaven I will ski and dance and swim and write amazing poetry and marvel at beauty and teach people (though maybe not, for there each person will have full access to God, seeing him face to face) . I will do all this as praise to my Brother and Lord, with a glad and peaceful heart, together with all my brothers and sisters. God will be my beloved and loving Flatmate, Husband and King. Nothing will be sullied by fear or mistrust or anxiety or pain or crying or death. For they are part of the old order of things, and in heaven all will be made new.


Heaven will be a physical place, better than but not wholly unlike this world (Isaiah 65:17, 66:22; Luke 22:18; John 14:2-3; 2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 19:9, 21:1-7 & 10-11 & 21-26, 22:1-2). So how about you try to imagine it too. Think of what would make a perfect world for you here - then make it better - then eclipse it all by God's presence (Psalm 16:11, 27:4, 73:25-26; Jude 1:24; Revelation 4:8, 21:3-4 & 23, 22:3-4).

Monday, March 16, 2009

Trust

Christians trust God and his Word – even when our experience from time to time seems to belie those truths. And postmodern non-Christians trust experience – even when a multiplicity of experiences point to different, contradictory truths.


Experience tends to be the more fickle master, but knowing this will not shake a postmodern’s trust. And we all live our daily lives putting our trust in truths (we don’t jump off buildings, we give our pasta time to cook, we don’t expect our lover to always please us), but knowing this will not shatter a postmodern’s trust.


Indeed arguments of any sort don't persuade people to shift their trust. What's needed is for them to see Christians living under the one, true God and to be witness to the goodness and coherence of that life.



Thanks to Christos for getting me thinking along this path.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

We Are All Part of the Body

My new Tassie pastor, Dan Shepheard, preached on The Body recently. I think that if a church, if my church, can understand this rightly, then it will result in a godly attitude amongst the sending church (Crossroads), the missionary (me) and the receiving church (?, somewhere in Latin America).

You need to listen to


I think that understanding the body helps bridge the natural distance we feel when people are physically far away. And I think that understanding the body helps correct false ideas about missionaries' roles and person (eg that they're doing something more worthy than everyone else or that they're more spiritual than everyone else). And I think that understanding the body empowers everyone to wholeheartedly and joyfully support everyone else, whatever their role.